recSEO vs an AI tool
Worth saying first: AI writes the first draft of a recSEO post too. Anyone selling content at this price and telling you otherwise isn’t being straight with you.
So the comparison isn’t human against machine. It’s what happens either side of the draft.
| A self-serve AI tool | recSEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Who decides what to write | You, from a prompt | We do, from your site and from search data |
| What it knows about you | What you type in | Your case studies, specialisms, team and current search position |
| Who reads it before you publish | Usually nobody | An ex-recruiter, then an expert copywriter |
| What each piece is for | Not usually stated | Labelled visibility or credibility |
| Your time | Prompting, generating, editing | Reading the posts and uploading them |
The failure mode isn’t bad grammar
A decent AI tool writes perfectly fluent copy. That’s exactly the risk. Four confident, slightly generic posts a month tell every buyer on your site that nobody senior was involved.
Your buyer is usually checking you out after a cold call. That’s a credibility test, and generic content fails it quietly.
What the human step is for
Catching the sentence that’s subtly wrong about how recruitment works, which a general model produces regularly and a non-recruiter never notices.
And taking out the tells. The tricolons, the “in today’s competitive landscape”, the confident summary of nothing.
Your questions, answered.
So you’re an AI tool with a person on top?
Will Google penalise AI written content?
Will this get us mentioned in ChatGPT?
The price is on the page
No estimate form, no discovery call before you can find out what it costs.